Hotels – all for one, one for all

Albert Llorca is a graduate of philosophy, who between 1999 and 2014 was a professor of liberal arts and tourism at the Autonomous University of Barcelona. Nearly a decade or so ago, Prof. Llorca he gave his opinion about parenting and how they do education.

At the age of 61, as he was in 2011, the professor noted that there was a “serious problem with education, starting with the family and ending with government agencies”. There was a “real protection” for children, too, which has been going on for years. The result was forgiveness and justify everything.

Parents did not provide guidance for their children. As a result, even in public places, children used to do things that their parents thought were right but that were not the case. So some people rejected the practice. “I don’t want to put up with this.”

In old school the professor must have been, because of his age, but he was not advocating a return to a visible but insignificant time. In fact, Prof. Llorca argued over ethics and concern for others. People are now “surprised” to meet a “student”. Old generation, and the uneducated child was different.

Consider what a professor was at the time. It was part of the cultural culture of the tourists that led him to be mentioned in the tourism industry, especially because, for a decade or so, there was a great deal of controversy surrounding the growth of the hotel and tourism market – just adults. hotels. Without saying whether he belonged to or against the hotels, Prof. Llorca presented an excellent defense case. “I don’t want to put up with this.” Not him but everyone.

Disputes over large hotels have been going on for years, and they reappeared in Alicante in October last year, when the Facua Consumer Council called on the Valencia regional government to fine luxury hotel a well-known fact that left everyone in no doubt that the hotels were older and at least a few years old – considered a 16-year-old but slightly older. The hotel’s website announced that the launch was “a place for adults only, where they can re-energize and be comfortable”.

It also stated that part of the charm was only for the elders. Such promotions led the council to suspect that the hotel was discriminating, and reiterated the Valencia government in January 2021 a ban on accommodation. discrimination on the basis of gender, nationality, race, ethnicity, culture, sexual orientation, gender identity, family development, sexual orientation, employment or disability, religion or belief, political opinion, poverty, language, beauty, body or any person or culture. culture or circumstances.

The hotel in question has now been forced to remove only adult-friendly business and will no longer be able to ban guests under the age of 16, after Facua confirmed it was trying to reserve a place through an online travel agency. Meanwhile, the Valencia government has made it clear that there will be no discrimination on any ground.

The law of the land is clear. Hotels have the right to be licensed but this simply means limited and limited, for example, up to years. In Mallorca, however, one can find business models where age is mentioned – only 16+ or 18+.

I can understand this, and it is not because of the reasons Professor Llorca was saying ten years ago. It is commercial, just as a hotel / tourist offers an item for a specific section and creates a hotel space based on this component.

At some point, I do not see anything wrong with it, and no doubt the law does not agree with what is happening in advertising. However, one might argue in the same way that this could mean the kind of discrimination that is permissible: only adults or women, but it can never be, it cannot be other races or religions only. Permissible discrimination may not be enshrined in the law of tourism (or any other) as it may be consistent with all the principles of equity,
It is alleged that Alicante’s case may have provided a precedent.

But as is the case under Valencia laws, no doubt, except in that province. That said, there are national laws – especially in any case – whereas Alicante’s case, even a little bit, could mean that it creates legal uncertainty.

Conflicts, I doubt, will continue, but in the end, there is one way in the Valencia law that I missed – “enfermedad”, disease or illness. Good. But which ones? And do they come with a vaccination certificate?


Original Article reposted fromSource link

Disclaimer: The website autopost contents from credible news sources and we are not the original creators. If we Have added some content that belongs to you or your organization by mistake, We are sorry for that. We apologize for that and assure you that this won’t be repeated in future. If you are the rightful owner of the content used in our Website, please mail us with your Name, Organization Name, Contact Details, Copyright infringing URL and Copyright Proof (URL or Legal Document) aT spacksdigital @ gmail.com

I assure you that, I will remove the infringing content Within 48 Hours.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *