Novak Djokovic is said to have returned to prison on Saturday after his case of refusing to be deported to Australia for not receiving the COVID-19 vaccine was transferred to three judges in the high court.
The Federal Court hearing is set to take place on Sunday, a day before the number one tennis player and nine Australian Open champions begin defending their title in the first Grand Slam tennis tournament of the year.
Police closed the driveway behind the house where Djokovic’s lawyers lived and two cars drove out of the house at around noon on Saturday. On video, Djokovic can be seen wearing a face mask in the back of a car near a refugee locker hotel.
The Australian Associated Press reported that Djokovic had returned to prison. He spent four nights in a hotel near the city of Melbourne before being released last Monday when he won a court case against his first visa application.
Immigration Minister Alex Hawke on Friday revoked the 34-year-old Serb visa, which was revoked on arrival when he arrived at Melbourne airport on January 5.
Deportation to Australia could result in a three-year ban on their return to the country, although they may be deported, depending on circumstances.
Djokovic admitted that his travel announcement was wrong because it failed to show that he had lived in many countries two weeks before his arrival in Australia.
But much of the misconception is not why Hawke thought the expulsion of Djokovic was for the benefit of the people.
His lawyers filed a lawsuit in court Saturday that revealed that Hawke claimed that “Djokovic is known by some as a charm for people who hate vaccines.”
Australia is one of the largest vaccinated countries in the world, while 89% of people aged 16 and over have a COVID-19 vaccine.
But the minister said Djokovic’s presence in Australia could be a threat to the health and “well-being” of the Australian people. His presence “could be counterproductive in vaccinating others in Australia,” the ministry said.
The Department of Health recommended that Djokovic had a “low” risk of transmitting COVID-19 and a “very low risk” of transmitting the disease to the Australian Open.
The ministry cited Djokovic’s comments in April 2020, before the COVID-19 vaccine was discovered, as “anti-vaccine.”
Djokovic “has said in the past that he would not want to be pressured by someone to take the vaccine” to compete in the competition.
The evidence “is clearly a clear demonstration of anti-vaccine views,” the minister wrote in his defense of Djokovic’s visa ban.
Djokovic’s lawyers claim that the minister did not cite any evidence that Djokovic’s presence in Australia “could promote anti-vaccination ideas.”
Djokovic will be released from prison hotel on Sunday to visit his lawyers’ office to hear a court video.
On Saturday, Federal Chief Justice James Allsop announced his acquittal with Justices David O’Callaghan and Anthony Besanko.
The decision of the three judges to hear the appeal instead of just one judge raises the importance of the case from the judges’ point of view and may give Djokovic an opportunity.
The three are regarded as skilled judges who are more likely to find a minister who has more problems than their junior counterparts.
O’Callaghan had previously said the entire bench would hear the case. A full bench is three or five judges.
A full bench means that no decision can be made on appeal. The only way to appeal is to the Supreme Court and there can be no guarantee that the court will accept the appeal.
Djokovic’s lawyer Paul Holdenson appointed the entire bench while Hawke’s lawyer Stephen Lloyd appointed one judge.
“There is nothing special about the reasons,” Lloyd argued, referring to Djokovic’s argument that Hawke made an unwise decision without evidence.
“They are not legally new and we say there is no reason to go out on a regular basis” in the selection of three judges, Lloyd added.
Lawmakers suspect Lloyd wants the election to be re-opened in another Federal Court appeal because he thinks the minister could file a serious lawsuit without rushing to issue a verdict before Monday.
Djokovic has won Australia’s last three Opens, part of his Grand Slam game in 20 tournaments.
In a televised Wednesday post that made the most of the group’s comments, Djokovic criticized his agent for looking at the wrong box on the screen, calling it “human error and not intentional.”
In the same post, Djokovic said he continued interviewing and photographing with a French newspaper in Serbia despite knowing that he had tested COVID-19 two days earlier. Djokovic has been trying to use what he says is a good test taken on December 16 to acknowledge the lack of medical care that would allow him to carry the vaccine requirements because he already had COVID-19.
By canceling Djokovic’s visa, Hawke said Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s government “is committed to protecting Australia’s borders, especially in relation to the COVID-19 epidemic.”
Morrison himself received Djokovic awaiting dismissal. The case has affected the nerves in Australia, especially in Victoria state, where locals spent hundreds of days trapped during the worst of the epidemic.
Australia is experiencing a staggering number of viruses that are transmitted by a variety of omicrons. On Friday, the country reported 130,000 new cases, including about 35,000 in Victoria state. Although many people living with the virus are not as sick as they used to be, the operation still poses serious health problems, and more than 4,400 people have been hospitalized. It has also disrupted workplaces and chain chains.
Djokovic’s aides in Serbia are disappointed with the revocation of visas. Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic on Friday criticized the Australian government for “harassing” and “torturing” Djokovic and asked if he was just trying to get political views ahead of the upcoming elections.
“Why didn’t you return it immediately, or tell him it was impossible to get a visa?” Vucic asked Australian officials for a visitation address. “Why are you harassing her and not only abusing her, but also her family and the entire free and proud nation.”
Everyone at the Australian Open – including players, support teams and spectators – should be vaccinated.
According to Grand Slam rules, if Djokovic is forced out of the competition before the Day 1 game schedule is announced, 5th seed Andrey Rublev will replace Djokovic in bracket.
If Djokovic exits the tournament on Monday after being released, he will be replaced by the so-called “lost chance” – a player who has lost a qualifying match but has entered a major competition due to exit before another race. he started.
And if Djokovic plays a match – or beyond – and is told he will no longer be able to take part in the tournament, his next opponent will just go into the next round and there will be no replacement.
More AP tennis: https://apnews.com/hub/tennis and https://twitter.com/AP_Sports
Original Article reposted fromSource link
Disclaimer: The website autopost contents from credible news sources and we are not the original creators. If we Have added some content that belongs to you or your organization by mistake, We are sorry for that. We apologize for that and assure you that this won’t be repeated in future. If you are the rightful owner of the content used in our Website, please mail us with your Name, Organization Name, Contact Details, Copyright infringing URL and Copyright Proof (URL or Legal Document) aT spacksdigital @ gmail.com
I assure you that, I will remove the infringing content Within 48 Hours.