The Australian government’s decision to revoke Novak Djokovic’s visa has sparked online controversy.
For the second time in a week, the world’s best tennis player was declared a loser at the Australian Open, which has been dominated by the government for the past ten years.
The Australian Open is always Novak Djokovic’s reader. For the past few months, a Serbian official has tried to keep his vaccine secret but only one week later he was arrested by Border Force officials and in the midst of a major crisis in the Australian government, with Prime Minister Scott Morrison and Immigration Minister Alex Hawke having an affair. their.
For the second time in a few weeks, Djokovic had his visa revoked in a way that, unless he appealed immediately, dashed his hopes of defending his crown at Melbourne Park this month. The move has deeply divided Australians most affected by the rapid rise of Covid-19 cases, while Djokovic’s vaccination outrage has angered the public and the ruling party, which some have accused of seeking blood.
Many others, however, doubt the loyalty of Aussie government officials in their actions.
It was amazing! The Morrison government invited #Djokovica visa can be found successful over the weekend of the media – showing us all how bald she is. Why on earth did he issue a visa in the first place? One major political threat from empty shelves & a global shortage of incentives & RATs. https://t.co/SoHuI1Cfwe
– Kevin Rudd (@MrKRudd) January 14, 2022
Djokovic’s visa was revoked on the grounds of “public interest” relating to “health” and “good order” .1. With covid cases in the hundreds of thousands, how can it be “healthy”? 2. How could one person whose job it be to hit the ball with a racquet be a threat to human “system”?
– Leigh Sales (@leighsales) January 14, 2022
“It was amazing!“wrote former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, a candidate for Morrison’s Liberal Party.
“The Morrison government has banned visa visas for Djokovic to win over the weekend of radio – showing us all how he has hair on his chest. Why on earth did he issue a visa in the first place? One major political upheaval from empty shelves & a global lack of motivation & [Rapid Antigen Tests].“
“Djokovic visa revoked on the grounds of ‘public interest; ‘health’ and ‘good order’, ”added journalist Leigh Sales.
“1. With covid fever in the hundreds of thousands, how can it be ‘healthy’? 2. How can one person whose job it is to hit the ball with the racket be a threat to the ‘system’ of the people?“
Morrison’s opponents were increasingly pressuring even before the election. Independent Senator Jacqui Lambie echoed the announcement, saying the whole threat was used by the Liberal Party as a way to prevent the failure of their Covid-19 strategy, as well as to convince people who were forced to tolerate what others did. to see if the restrictions are unnecessarily long.
“This is an absolute distraction. Let go of what makes us look like the world. It is absolutely amazing, “he said.
Jim Chalmers of the opposition Labor Party admitted, saying the government’s approach is “[use] this Novak Djokovic saga as a distraction from the shortage of our supermarkets, the shortage of our medical professionals, the shortage of staff.. “
Djokovic appears to have appealed the verdict – but he hopes the same will happen again in Monday’s case when the original verdict was overturned seems impossible according to Melbourne’s lawyer Kian Bone.
“For Djokovic to get the results he needs to play it would be very difficult for him to get over the weekend, ” he said. “If you quit later than he did here, I think he’s fine [Hawke’s] severely disrupting Djokovic’s legal team, depending on the options or treatment they can get. “
Bone added that the letter appeared to be on the wall of Djokovic’s hopes of violating state law and that a move to do so, which would require special laws against deportation and forcing Hawke to revoke Djokovic’s visa, would be impossible.
“The second order never happened, ”Said Bone.Courts often require a member of the public to issue a visa. “
Djokovic’s red-colored tape, which is a symbol of political politics and immigration issues, says Greg Barns, SC, of the Australian Law Alliance.
“Great ability given to a [Immigration] The ministry means that political ideology drives elections that have a profound impact on people’s lives, “the judge he said.
“It is amazing that we have allowed one person to have this level of control not driven by supernatural powers. In most cases, there is no right to appeal the decision of the Prime Minister or any other relevant review of the decision.
“Most people do not have the resources that Djokovic has to deal with law enforcement agencies to protect them. “
Original Article reposted fromSource link
Disclaimer: The website autopost contents from credible news sources and we are not the original creators. If we Have added some content that belongs to you or your organization by mistake, We are sorry for that. We apologize for that and assure you that this won’t be repeated in future. If you are the rightful owner of the content used in our Website, please mail us with your Name, Organization Name, Contact Details, Copyright infringing URL and Copyright Proof (URL or Legal Document) aT spacksdigital @ gmail.com
I assure you that, I will remove the infringing content Within 48 Hours.